MScBMC and AI

Public discourse around AI often falls into two extremes: enthusiastic adoption on one side and complete rejection on the other. Our position resists this binary. We feel there is a middle ground, where distinguishing between responsible innovation and ethical risk requires careful thought. Operating within this middle ground requires ongoing critical reflection, balancing the promise of new technologies with the obligations of scientific rigour, professional accountability, and ethical practice (see our communities and values page for a more thorough discussion of our views about artificial intelligence tools). Beyond the flashy outputs of AI image generators, there is an evolving category of assistive AI tools that promise to improve research workflows and ease some difficult production tasks. Some of these tools are trained ethically, retain artistic control, and avoid issues with copyright, environmental impact, accountability, and effects on employment (see our communities and values page for a more thorough discussion these issues). While we are advocating for a nuanced approach to evaluating these technologies, we acknowledge that individuals may have differing comfort levels and ethical thresholds, and some may draw their line differently from us, or choose to avoid AI tools completely. 

Generative AI may or may not be inherently unethical, but many of its current implementations raise serious ethical and practical concerns. As instructors, we are actively monitoring developments in AI and exploring limited, carefully guided ways to integrate vetted tools into our curriculum and professional practice. This does not imply forced or prescribed adoption, but rather a mindful approach that encourages critical reflection on when, how, and why such tools may be appropriately used. Naturally, the use of AI tools in coursework may differ across MScBMC classes. In some courses, students may be invited to critically examine AI’s capabilities and limits, but participation is voluntary. The MScBMC program does not require the use of AI, consistent with our belief in thoughtful, ethical, and human-centred design practice. 

Navigate here to read more about ethical and practical concerns regarding AI use in our profession.